JUAMARINO WHITE, PETITIONER,
v.
WALTER A. MCNEIL, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Juamarino White, mistakenly released and then re-incarcerated by the Florida Department of Corrections, sought a writ of mandamus to challenge the Department's denial of sentence credit for time served out of prison. The appellate court denied his certiorari petition challenging the circuit court's denial of mandamus, but clarified that declaratory judgment is the proper remedy for such inmate challenges.
While the circuit court correctly denied the mandamus petition, it did so for the wrong reason. Declaratory judgment is the established remedy for an inmate in this circumstance, and the Department's decision was properly subject to challenge through that remedy, not mandamus.
[1] A petition for writ of certiorari is the appropriate procedural vehicle to review an order denying a petition for writ of mandamus.
[2] Declaratory judgment is the proper remedy for an inmate challenging a rule regarding credit toward sentence completion.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“declaratory judgment is the remedy for an inmate in this circumstance”
Establishes the proper legal remedy for inmates challenging Department of Corrections administrative decisions regarding sentence credits.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWhite was mistakenly released prematurely from the Florida Department of Corrections. Upon his return to custody, the Department held a hearing under …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rules Of Civil Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Juamarino White petitions this court for a writ of certiorari to review an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County which denied a petition for writ of mandamus. We have jurisdiction in accordance with Sheley v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 720 So. 2d 216 (Fla.1998). For the reasons set forth below, we deny the certiorari petition, but do so without prejudice to White’s right to seek relief through the appropriate remedy in circuit court.
Petitioner was mistakenly released prematurely from custody of the Florida Department of Corrections. When he was returned to custody, the Department held a hearing as authorized by its F.A.C. Rule 33-601.604 and concluded that petitioner was not entitled to credit toward completion of his sentence for the time he was out of prison. He exhausted his administrative remedies and filed a mandamus petition in the Supreme Court of Florida, which transferred the petition to circuit court. After considering the Department’s response and petitioner’s reply, the circuit court denied relief, finding that mandamus was not an appropriate remedy for an inmate’s challenge to a rule. In his reply, petitioner had asked that the petition be treated as a complaint seeking declaratory relief but the court denied that request on the theory that there was no uncertainty or insecurity regarding petitioner’s rights under a statute, rule, or written instrument.
We find that the circuit court correctly denied the request to treat the mandamus petition as a declaratory judgment action but for the wrong reason. Such a claim must be properly pleaded and the defendant or defendants served in accordance with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. However, it is well-established that declaratory judgment is the remedy for an inmate in this circumstance. Endress v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr., 612 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). To the extent the circuit court’s order holds otherwise, it is incorrect. We decline to issue the writ of certiorari because the outcome of the circuit court litigation, denial of the mandamus petition was proper. PETITION DENIED.
KAHN, LEWIS, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 720 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 1998)
- Endress v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 612 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)