TREVE LAMAR OATS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Oats appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.8501 motion for post-conviction relief. Among his several claims, Oats alleged that in Case No. 06-326 he pled to a sale of cocaine offense, but the judgment reflects a conviction for sale of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a place of worship. There were no attachments to the trial court’s order refuting this allegation.
On remand, the trial court shall either attach documents which refute the claim or correct the judgment. Valentine v. State, 873 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). The trial court’s order is otherwise affirmed.
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; REMANDED.
PALMER, C. J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur. . Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Welch v. Welch, 22 So. 3d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…ent the trial court could and should have made more detailed findings to explain its precise calculations of income, we conclude that the former wife failed to preserve this specific issue in a [*156] timely motion for rehearing. See Anaya v. Anaya, 987 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); Hoffman v. Hoffman, 793 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Broadfoot v. Broadfoot, 791 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Reis v. Reis, 739 So. 2d 704, 705-06 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Counsel for the former wife filed a motion for appellat…
-
FOX v. FOX, 262 So. 3d 789 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)…). The court adopted this "sensible" approach, holding that it would consider "the lack of adequate findings as an unpreserved error unless previously brought to the trial court's attention." Id. (footnote omitted); see also [*798] Anaya v. Anaya , 987 So. 2d 806, 807 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) ("A party may not complain about 'inadequate findings in a dissolution case unless the alleged defect was brought to the trial court's attention in a motion for rehearing.' " (quoting Mathieu , 877 So. 2d at 741 ) ). In a f…
-
Gus Spreng v. Spreng, 162 So. 3d 168 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)…al findings with regard to the factors set forth in Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla.1985), we find that this error was not preserved for appeal because Husband never filed a motion for rehearing. See Anaya v. Anaya, 987 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); Mathieu v. Mathieu, 877 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). AFFIRMED. PALMER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur. . Husband also appeals the denial of his motion for a continuance of the hearing. Finding no abuse of discretion in that denia…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Valentine v. State, 873 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)