GLESSNER
v.
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A Dade County circuit court upheld the suspension of an alcohol test technician who challenged the constitutionality of a county personnel rule authorizing suspension for conduct unbecoming an employee. The court rejected the petitioner's vagueness challenge, finding the rule constitutional and the administrative proceedings adequate.
The court upheld the suspension and rejected the vagueness challenge, finding that the weight of authority in the country supports the validity of such a personnel rule and that it is constitutional.
[1] A personnel rule declaring "conduct unbecoming an employee of the county whether on or off duty" as cause for dismissal, demotion, or suspension is constitutionally valid…
[2] A hearing examiner's report in an administrative proceeding is supported by substantial, competent evidence when the facts presented in the suspension letter are accepted…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“That the employee has been guilty of conduct unbecoming an employee of the county whether on or off duty.”
The personnel rule under which petitioner was suspended; petitioner challenged this rule as unconstitutionally vague
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePetitioner was suspended for four days from his position as an alcohol test technician with the Dade County Department of Public Safety under Article …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unconstitutionally Vague Statute cases and more on FLexlaw
Petitioner was suspended for four days from his position as an alcohol test technician with the Dade County Department of Public Safety for violation of Article VIII, Section 7, Dade County Personnel Rules —
“Cause for dismissal, demotion or suspension: The following are declared to be cause for dismissal, demotion or suspension of an employee without pay though charges may be based on causes other than those enumerated:
* * * «•
“(I) That the employee has been guilty of conduct unbecoming an employee of the county whether on or off duty.”
Petitioner demanded and received a personnel hearing to review his suspension. At the hearing, petitioner accepted the facts as set forth in the department’s letter of suspension. His sole basis for appeal was that the above personnel rule under which he was suspended was unconstitutionally vague. The hearing examiner found the facts as set forth in the suspension letter and recommended that petitioner be suspended. Based upon this report and recommendation, the county manager upheld the petitioner’s suspension.-
*163This cause came before the court upon the petition for writ of certiorari directed to the administrative proceedings described above, and the court having considered the said petition, the record submitted, the briefs of the parties and having heard oral argument of counsel, finds and determines that the hearing examiner’s report is supported by substantial, competent evidence in the record.
The court further finds and determines that the personnel hearing provided the petitioner conformed to the essential requirements of law. Accordingly, the action of the 'county manager in upholding the petitioner’s suspension be and the same is hereby upheld.
Petitioner has challenged the constitutionality of Chapter VIII, Section 7(1) of the Dade County Personnel Rules quoted above as being unconstitutionally vague. The court finds, however, that the weight of authority in this country is against the position advocated by the petitioner. Therefore, this court finds and determines that Chapter VIII, Section 7(1) of the Dade County Personnel Rules is valid and constitutional.
It is accordingly, ordered and adjudged that — (1) The petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied without prejudice. (2) The petitioner’s suspension be and the same is hereby upheld.