STANLEY N. TAVORN, APPELLANT,
v.
WARDEN P. SKIPPER, ET AL, APPELLEES
STANLEY N. TAVORN, APPELLANT,
WARDEN P. SKIPPER, ET AL, APPELLEES
987 So. 2d 204
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellees’ Motion to Dismiss, filed on May 7, 2008, to which the appellant has filed no response, the Court has determined that the appeal was not commenced within 30 days of rendition of the order on appeal as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b). Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely.
DISMISSED.
KAHN, PADOVANO, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gonzalez-Chavez v. State, 34 So. 3d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Triana, 979 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); Pritchard v. State, 987 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); Jones v. State, 658 So. 2d 178 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); State v. Swank, 399 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), pet. den. 408 So. 2d 1096 (Fla.1981).…
-
State v. Watson, 187 So. 3d 349 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)…. While the test to be applied to factual findings of the .trial court in this regard is whether competent, substantial evidence supports those findings, the trial court’s application of the law to the facts is reviewed de novo. Pritchard v. State, 987 So. 2d 204, 205 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (citations omitted). The State argues that the trial court erred in granting Watson’s suppression motion because, based on the fellow officer rule, reasonable suspicion existed to stop Watson. We agree. In Bowers v. State,…
-
State v. Beans, 215 So. 3d 172 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)…umption of correctness, and the appellate court must interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences therefrom in a manner most favorable to sustaining the ruling. State v. Watson, 187 So. 3d 349, 351 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (citing Pritchard v. State, 987 So. 2d 204, 205 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)). While the trial court’s factual findings are reviewed for substantial, competent evidence, its application of the law to the facts is reviewed de novo. State v. Thomas, 109 So. 3d 814, 817 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (citing McMas…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence