DOROTHY COLLINS SIMPSON, APPELLANT,
v.
ESTATE OF ROOSEVELT NORTON, TANGELA NORTON HAS, AND CEDRIC NORTON, APPELLEES
DOROTHY COLLINS SIMPSON, APPELLANT,
ESTATE OF ROOSEVELT NORTON, TANGELA NORTON HAS, AND CEDRIC NORTON, APPELLEES
984 So. 2d 577
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 19 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of a final order in a probate proceeding. The facts of the case and a number of legal issues were addressed in an earlier opinion of this Court, Simpson v. Estate of Norton, 949 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). The trial court’s rulings were entered after an evidentiary hearing. We conclude that the rulings are supported by competent substantial evidence. The appellant has failed to demonstrate the existence of any error of law or abuse of discretion.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
West v. State, 22 So. 3d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…eking credit for seven days of jail time served in Georgia. We affirm because the relief that Appellant is seeking is not available under rule 3.800(a), but rather must be raised on direct appeal or in a timely rule 3.850 motion. See Gomez v. State, 984 So. 2d 577, 578 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (“[A] claim seeking additional jail credit for time served in jail in another state is not cognizable in a 3.800(a) motion.”); Garnett v. State, 957 So. 2d 32, 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (en banc) (“If a defendant is seeking out-…
-
Sambolin v. State, 2 So. 3d 1097 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Gomez v. State, 984 So. 2d 577, 578 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (holding claim seeking additional jail credit for time served in jail in another state is not cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a)); see also Garnett v. State, 957 So. 2d 32, 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).…
-
Bonilla v. State, 110 So. 3d 492 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…laim that a defendant is entitled to out-of-state jail credit is not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion; such a claim must be raised either on direct appeal or in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Gomez v. State, 984 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); West v. State, 22 So. 3d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Sambolin v. State, 2 So. 3d 1097 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); Garnett v. State, 957 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (en banc). However, even by the time Bonilla filed his prior motion rai…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Simpson v. In re Est. OF Roosevelt Norton, 949 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)