DANIEL HILBERT, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Standard Of Review On Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On appeal from a summary denial of a motion for postconviction relief, this Court must reverse unless the record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), (D).
Appellant’s motion raises several claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied relief without holding an evidentiary hearing or attaching the record. We, therefore, must reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief or an evidentiary hearing. See Langdon v. State, 947 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rigoberto Perdomo v. State, 2 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…identiary hearing on these two claims or for summary disposition supported by those portions of the record (which shall be attached to the summary disposition order) conclusively showing that appellant is entitled to no relief. See Hilbert v. State, 981 So. 2d 1274, 1274-75 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); Langdon v. State, 947 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Reversed and remanded with instructions.…
Authorities Cited
- Langdon v. State, 947 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)