STATE, EX REL., D. LEE
v.
PAUL C. ALBRITTON, CIRCUIT JUDGE

Fla. | 1933-08-02
Davis, C. J., and AVhitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
111 Fla. 606 Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Also reported at: 149 So. 636

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court denied a writ of mandamus seeking to compel a circuit judge to confirm a foreclosure sale, holding that such judicial discretion cannot be corrected by mandamus and that appeal is the proper remedy.


Holding

No, a circuit judge's discretion in refusing to confirm a foreclosure sale, absent unreasonable or impossible conditions, cannot be corrected by mandamus.


Key Quotes

“The petition for the alternative writ must be denied because of discretion by circuit judges in refusing to confirm foreclosure sales, except upon condition that unreasonable or impossible requirements be met, cannot be corrected by mandamus.”

Establishes that mandamus is not the appropriate remedy for challenging a judge's discretion in confirming a foreclosure sale.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

A circuit judge refused to confirm a tax foreclosure sale where the property was bid in by the complainant for significantly less than the amount owed…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Davis, C. J.

Davis, C. J.

This is an application for issuance of an alternative writ of mandamus to coerce the Circuit Judge of the Twenty-seventh Judicial Circuit to enter an order confirming a foreclosure sale. The proceeding was one to foreclose a tax certificate. At a sale held under a final decree for $966.39 the property was bid in by complainant for $195.07. The circuit judge refused to confirm the sale, so the petition for alternative writ alleges, until the real estate sells for a sufficient amount in addition to the costs, an amount sufficient to' pay all the taxes involved. The command of the proposed alternative writ is not that the circuit judge be mandated to act upon a petition for confirmation of the sale, but that he be mandated to enter an order confirming the particular sale already made and reported by the master.

The petition for the alternative writ must be denied because of discretion by circuit judges in refusing to confirm foreclosure sales, except upon condition that unreasonable or impossible requirements be met, cannot be corrected by mandamus. The proper method of redress is to proceed by appeal from the order refusing to confirm, to test the propriety of the court’s action in entering the order complained of, in which event the appellate court, after review of the facts offered to support the petition to confirm the sale, will either affirm or reverse the order appealed from, as justice requires.

Alternative writ denied.

Davis, C. J., and AVhitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw