PETER LETTERESE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND PETER LETTERESE & ASSOCIATES, INC., D/B/A GALILEO SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AND D/B/A S.A.V.E! INTERNATIONAL, APPELLANTS,

v.

DR. SCOTT L. BRODY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Shea v. State, 97 So. 3d 861 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
  …al sentence. Appellant’s motion raised various claims of scoresheet error and improper weapon enhancements. The court denied the motion without explanation, without a State response, and without any attachments. This was improper. Fleming v. State, 980 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Matyjasik v. State, 969 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Sheffield v. State, 903 So. 2d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). See also Terry v. State, 970 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (summarily reversing the denial of a Rule 3.850…
• Jean-Charles v. State, 100 So. 3d 1272 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
  …nt’s motion for additional jail [*1273] credit and remand for further proceedings. The court denied the motion without explanation and without attaching records to refute the claim. Shea v. State, 97 So. 3d 861 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Fleming v. State, 980 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Matyjasik v. State, 969 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Sheffield v. State, 903 So. 2d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Reversed and Remanded. WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.…
• Fisher v. State, 6 So. 3d 118 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
  …hat the trial court’s written sentence fails to comport with the oral pronouncement associated with other active sentences. Both motions were summarily denied without attachments, comment, or a request for the state to respond. See Fleming v. State, 980 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Terry v. State, 970 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). We reverse and remand for further review of the claim, noting that the relief offered under a rule 3.850 motion does not limit Fisher to the record as detailed in Williams v. S…