FLORENCE M. SLUSSER, BY AND THROUGH BRIAN SLUSSER, PLENARY GUARDIAN, APPELLANT,
v.
LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. A/K/A LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. OF TENNESSEE, FORREST L. PRESTON, JOHN L. MORRIS, ELEANOR HEATON AND ALISON GRAZIANI (AS TO LIFE CARE CENTER OF PORT ST. LUCIE), APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An arbitration agreement for claims under the Nursing Home Residents Act is not unconscionable simply because it waives access to the courts.
[1] An agreement to arbitrate claims arising under the Nursing Home Residents Act is not unconscionable solely because it waives access to the courts.
[2] A voluntary waiver of access to the courts to resolve claims arising under the Nursing Home Residents Act is valid.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA nursing home resident signed an arbitration agreement, was injured, and sued the nursing home for negligence. The trial court compelled arbitration.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DAMOORGIAN, J.
Florence Slusser appeals an order compelling arbitration in a negligence action brought against Life Care Centers of America (“Life Care”), a nursing home. We affirm and hold that an agreement that provides for arbitration of claims brought under the Nursing Home Residents Act, chapter 400.023, et seq., Florida Statutes (2005), is not unconscionable simply because it waives access to the courts to resolve claims arising under the Act. See Richmond Healthcare, Inc. v. Digati, 878 So. 2d 388, 390 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).
By way of background, Slusser checked herself into a nursing home owned by Life Care. During the admission process, Slus-ser executed an agreement to arbitrate all disputes and claims between the parties. While at the nursing home, Slusser was injured and sued Life Care in the circuit court for negligence. Life Care timely moved the trial court for an order compelling arbitration under the terms of the arbitration agreement. The trial court granted Life Care’s motion. This appeal follows.
In Digati, we held that a court does not have the power to decline to enforce an arbitration agreement simply because it waives access to the courts to resolve claims arising under Act. Digati, 878 So. 2d at 390. Notwithstanding our holding in Digati Appellant argues that, because the Act was passed as a valid exercise of the legislature’s police power, access to the courts cannot be waived. Appellant cites as authority only the concurring opinion in Blankfeld v. Richmond Health Care, Inc., 902 So. 2d 296, 301 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (en banc) (Farmer, J., concurring). We do not agree with that argument.
Had the legislature intended to stop parties from arbitrating their claims under the Act, it would have created an express prohibition. It did not do so. We therefore conclude that a voluntary waiver of access to the courts to resolve claims aris ing under the Nursing Home Residents Act is valid. Digati, 878 So. 2d at 390.
Affirmed.
KLEIN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Manorcare Health Servs., Inc. v. Stiehl, 22 So. 3d 96 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…So. 2d 982 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Estate of Blanchard v. Cent. Park Lodges (Tarpon Springs), Inc., 805 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Five Points Health Care, Ltd. v. Mallory, 998 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Slusser v. Life Care Ctrs. of Am., Inc., 977 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Estate of Orlanis v. Oakwood Terrace Skilled Nursing & Rehab. Ctr., 971 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Place at Vero Beach, Inc. v. Hanson, 953 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Fletcher v. Huntington Place Ltd. P'ship, 952 So. 2d…
-
Palm Court NH, L.L.C. v. Rickiee Dowe, 336 So. 3d 735 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)…denied the motion to compel based on the first prong of the inquiry, ruling the arbitration agreement was invalid as contrary to public policy. However, neither waiving access to courts, see Slusser ex rel. Slusser v. Life Care Ctrs. of Am., Inc., 977 So. 2d 662, 663 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), nor limiting judicial review, see Fla. Holdings III, LLC v. Duerst ex rel. Duerst, 198 So. 3d 834, 843 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016), alone make an arbitration agreement unenforceable as against public policy. The arbitration agreeme…
Authorities Cited
- Blankfeld v. Richmond Health Care, Inc., 902 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
- Richmond Healthcare, Inc. v. Digati, 878 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)