SANDRA PINEIRO, APPELLANT,
v.
LAW FIRM OF FRANKLIN & CRISCUOLO AND RIGOBERTO PINEIRO, HUSBAND, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 2008-02-20
No. 4D05-4589
STONE and MAY, JJ., concur.
976 So. 2d 1146 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2008) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Topics
Charging Lien

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Charging Lien cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
POLEN, J.

POLEN, J.

Appellant Sandra E. Pineiro appeals the trial court’s orders denying her motion to vacate orders granted in favor of Appellee, Franklin and Criscuolo (F & C), and granting F & C’s motions for a charging lien and final money judgment against Pi-neiro for nonpayment for services rendered. The trial court orally reserved jurisdiction to hold an evidentiary hearing on both parties’ section 57.105 claims, but entered a written order reserving jurisdiction only to hear F & C’s claims. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Pineiro’s motion but remand the case to the trial court with instructions to amend the order to reflect its oral ruling reserving jurisdiction to hear both parties’ section 57.105 claims. See Romero v. Romero, 916 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (reverse and remand portions of written order that did not reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncements).

STONE and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Rodriguez v. Medero, 17 So. 3d 867 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
    …on the clarified rulings. See Brewer v. Brewer, 3 So. 3d 432, 433 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (“Reversal is required where the final judgment is inconsistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement.”); see also Pineiro v. Law Firm of Franklin & Criscuolo, 976 So. 2d 1146, 1146 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (reversal and remand required so that the trial court can amend the order to reflect its oral ruling); cf. Hampton v. State, 711 So. 2d 200, 201-02 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (remanding the case for the trial court to clarify the…
  • Thomas v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
  • Wendall Hall v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr. (N.D. Fla. 2025)
    …3, 894 (Fla. 2020) (same); Butler v. State, 55 So. 3d 598, 599-600 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (affirming trial court's decision to strike motion to correct illegal sentence in accordance with previous order barring further pro se filings); Mobley v. State, 976 So. 2d 1146, 1147 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (same); see also Wells v. Miller, 652 F. App'x 874, 875 (11th Cir. 2016). ---PAGE 20--- Case 3:25-cv-00338-LC-MJF Document 17 Filed 11/21/25 Page 20 of 25 The state circuit court's rejection of Hall's claims on an independ…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw