STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
DELCIA MARIA SUAZO, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a trial court cannot dismiss charges based on an oral motion to dismiss when no written motion has been filed.
The State filed an information charging the defendant with driving with a revoked license. At a plea hearing, the trial court invited the defendant to…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
STRINGER, Judge.
The State appeals the dismissal of an information filed against Delcia Suazo. Because Suazo never filed a written motion to dismiss, we reverse.
On November 1, 2006, the State filed an information charging Suazo with one count of driving while her license was revoked as a habitual offender. At a change of plea hearing, Suazo intended to plead guilty to a reduced charge of driving with no valid license as part of a plea agreement with the State. However, after hearing the factual basis for the charge, instead of accepting Suazo’s plea the trial court asked Sua-zo if she wanted to move to dismiss the charge against her. Suazo accepted the trial court’s offer and orally moved to dismiss. Over the State’s objection that dismissal would be improper because no written motion to dismiss had been filed, the trial court dismissed the charge with prejudice. The State then brought this appeal.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(a) requires that a motion to dismiss be in writing. This court has repeatedly held that it is improper for a trial court to dismiss charges when the defendant has not filed a written motion to dismiss. State v. Reedy, 862 So. 2d 941, 942 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); State v. Alexander, 831 So. 2d 1252, 1253 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); State v. Pope, 674 So. 2d 901, 901 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). These cases hold that the remedy for the improper dismissal is reversal and remand for further proceedings. Reedy, 862 So. 2d at 942; Alexander, 831 So. 2d at 1253; Pope, 674 So. 2d at 901.
In this case, Suazo did not file a written motion at any time prior to the dismissal of the charge against her. As Suazo properly concedes in this appeal, it was error for the trial court to grant her oral motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
SILBERMAN, J., and GALLEN, THOMAS M., Associate Senior Judge, Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Lindemuth, 193 So. 3d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…otion to dismiss that information. The only motion to dismiss filed by the defendant was a motion to dismiss the initial information. It was clearly error to dismiss the charges where no written motion to. dismiss had been filed. See State v. Suazo, 973 So. 2d 1273, 1273-74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (“This court has repeatedly held that it is improper for a trial court to dismiss charges when the defendant has not filed a written motion to dismiss.”) (citing Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.190(a)). Second, the dismissal of the re…
-
State v. A. J., 255 So. 3d 891 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)…nd signed by the party making the motion or the attorney for the party," and "[t]his court has repeatedly held that it is improper for a trial court to dismiss charges when the defendant has not filed a written motion to dismiss." State v. Suazo, 973 So. 2d 1273, 1274 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (citing cases). Here, A.J.'s motion was not in writing, but made orally at the status conference. In addition, no "good cause" was shown by A.J. so as to permit the court to waive the requirement that the motion be in a s…
-
State v. Adams (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
Authorities Cited
- State v. Pope, 674 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
- State v. Reedy, 862 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
- Weldon v. State, 831 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
- State v. Alexander, 831 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)