ANTWAN OFFORD, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Staniclas v. Gamarnik (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)
  …stoppel claim is based is still at issue. . . . Necessarily, ‘the particular matter must be fully litigated and determined in a contest that results in a final decision of a court of competent jurisdiction.’” (quoting Bradenton Group, Inc. v. State, 970 So. 2d 403, 408 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007))); Bistline v. Rogers, 215 So. 3d 607, 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (“[Section 768.72, Florida Statutes] requires the trial court to act as a gatekeeper and precludes a claim for punitive damages where there is no reasonable evid…
• Shamond Byrd v. State, 167 So. 3d 480 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
  …se record demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have found victim injury given its verdict finding defendant guilty of second-degree murder). See also Padilla v. State, 159 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Offord v. State, 970 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). . Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). . Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004).…
• State v. Bradenton Grp., Inc., 26 So. 3d 636 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
  …e have already been decided against it in Bradenton Group, Inc. v. Department of Legal Affairs, 701 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), Department of Legal Affairs v. Bradenton Group, Inc., 727 So. 2d 199 (Fla.1998), and Bradenton Group, Inc. v. State, 970 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). As such, these issues are established law of the case, and we decline to address them again. Fla. Dep’t of Transp. v. Juliano, 801 So. 2d 101, 105 (Fla.2001). The only arguable issues remaining in this appeal are the State’s cl…

Authorities Cited

• Galindez v. State, 955 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 2007)
• Rouse v. State, 965 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)