VICTOR M. MADRIGAL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2007-12-12
No. 2D07-2667
SALCINES, WALLACE, and LaROSE, JJ., concur.
969 So. 2d 1204 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2007) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Victor Madrigal appeals an order summarily denying his motion to correct or modify sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(c). We treat the motion as a timely filed petition for writ of certiorari. See Seward v. State, 912 So. 2d 389, 390 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). Based on our precedent, we grant the petition, quash the order, and remand to the postconviction court to consider the merits of Mr. Madrigal’s motion. See McCormick v. State, 961 So. 2d 1099, 1102 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Cunniff v. State, 950 So. 2d 1255, 1256 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

SALCINES, WALLACE, and LaROSE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Real Invs., LLC v. The Oaks Grp., Inc., 973 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
    …he purchaser did not prevail in the litigation. We initially stayed this appeal as being moot, because the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of the seller. Our reversal of the summary judgment, Real Investments LLC v. Oaks Group, Inc., 969 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), makes the bond issue ripe, but we deny relief. The contract, which became effective in February, 2005, provided for a sales price of $2.9 million. At the hearing to determine the amount of the lis pendens bond, the seller prov…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw