WAYNE A. PULA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Pula appeals the denial of his most recent motion for post-conviction relief. Finding no merit in his argument, we affirm. In so doing, we take the additional step of barring Pula from filing any further pro se pleadings in this case.
Pula was tried and convicted of second degree murder eighteen years ago. His conviction was affirmed in Pula v. State, 578 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Since then Pula has filed multiple pro se motions for post-conviction relief, all of which have been denied by the trial court and this court. As a result, this court issued a show cause order pursuant to State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla.1999). Pula’s response was meritless.
AFFIRMED; Future Pro Se Filings PROHIBITED.
PALMER, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pula v. Dixon, 578 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)…la. 5th DCA 1993), Pula v. State, 652 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) 2 (affirming order denying postconviction motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a)), Pula v. State, 833 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), Pula v. State, 969 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (barring Pula from future pro se filings in the Fifth District). The court finds this appeal frivolous and refers Pula to the Department of Corrections for sanctions. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2023) (providing that “[a] pr…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Pula v. Dixon, 578 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)