DESMOND HARRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the Confrontation Clause as interpreted in Crawford v. Washington does not apply to probation revocation proceedings.
The defendant's probation was revoked based on a lab test indicating he tested positive for THC. The defense objected to the lab report as hearsay vio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Testimonial Hearsay cases and more on FLexlaw
THOMPSON, J.
Desmond Harris appeals his revocation of probation and sentence to the Department of Corrections. The evidence presented to the court was a lab test that indicated Harris tested positive for THC.1 When the State proffered the lab test to the trial court, the defense attorney objected, citing Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). The attorney argued that the lab report was hearsay and testimonial in nature and its admission violated Harris’ Sixth Amendment right of confrontation. We affirm.
In Wilcher v. State, 946 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007), and Russell v. State, 920 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), rev. granted, 926 So. 2d 1270 (Fla.2006), we held that Crawford does not apply to probation revocation proceedings. Harris concedes that we have previously addressed the issue and requests that we certify the question to the Florida Supreme Court. We grant the request and certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as one of great public importance:
DOES THE “TESTIMONIAL HEARSAY” RULE SET FORTH IN CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON, 541 U.S. 36 [124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177] (2004), APPLY IN COMMUNITY CONTROL AND/OR PROBATION REVOCATION PROCEEDINGS?
AFFIRMED; QUESTION CERTIFIED.
TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur. . Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol, THC, is the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (U.S. 2004)
- Simons v. State, 926 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 2006)
- Russell v. State, 920 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
- Wilcher v. State, 946 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)