GIVANNI PARKS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
GIVANNI PARKS, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
963 So. 2d 813
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vicken Bedoyan v. Harout Samra (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)…of fiduciary duty, an equitable claim for an accounting, and a statutory claim demanding a buyout of his partnership interest under the Revised Uniform Partnership Act of 1995 (“RUPA”),1 section 620.8405, 1 As explained in Larmoyeux v. Montgomery, 963 So. 2d 813, 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), Effective January 1, 1996, the legislature amended Florida's partnership law to adopt in substantial part the Revised Uniform Partnership Act (“RUPA”) (1994). Ch. 95–242, § 13, Laws of Fla.; . . . RUPA adopted the “entity…
-
Watkins v. Molina, 987 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Larmoyeux v. Montgomery, 963 So. 2d 813, 819-20 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Deseret Ranches of Fla., Inc. v. Bowman, 340 So. 2d 1232, 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).…
-
Givanni Torrell Parks v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984)