LAZAVIUS DONNELL WEBB, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LAZAVIUS DONNELL WEBB, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
963 So. 2d 802
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from a summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Defendant alleges that his prior juvenile adjudications cannot be used as predicate offenses. The State correctly points out that defendant’s motion is facially insufficient and was therefore properly denied. Weford v. State, 784 So. 2d 1222, 1223 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). The State’s response nevertheless requests that we reverse and remand for further proceedings. As we can find no error in the trial court’s ruling, we decline the State’s entreaty. We treat the State’s response as a confession of error, deny the confession of error and affirm.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Boatarama, Inc. v. Gomes, 7 So. 3d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…ough all subsequent stages of the proceedings.” This doctrine includes “issues explicitly ruled [upon] by the court” and issues [*582] “which were implicitly addressed or necessarily considered by the appellate court’s decision.” Borack v. Orovitz, 963 So. 2d 802, 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (quoting Specialty Rest. Corp. v. Elliott, 924 So. 2d 834, 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)). Based upon the foregoing, the court properly utilized the “high” value of $475,000 set forth in the Excerpt and we affirm the order on appea…
Authorities Cited
- Weford v. State, 784 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)