ORLANDO SALAZAR, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2007-07-25
Nos. 3D06-579, 3D05-2996
Before GERSTEN, C.J., WELLS, and SHEPHERD, JJ.
962 So. 2d 968 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2007) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wallace v. State, 939 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Reynolds Brooks v. State, 143 So. 3d 1093 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
    …ant] met the statutory criteria for commitment as a sexually violent predator.” Marshall v. State, 915 So. 2d 264, 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), receded from on other grounds by Special v. Baux, 79 So. 3d 755 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); see also Paige v. State, 962 So. 2d 968, 969 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (testimony regarding the civil commitment screening process is inadmissible on grounds of relevancy); Ortegas-Mantilla v. State, 898 So. 2d 1164, 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“[TJestimony regarding the process used in filing the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw