JANET JOYNER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JANET JOYNER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
962 So. 2d 377
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon the state’s proper concession of error, we reverse appellant’s judgment and sentence and remand for a new trial. See Smith v. State, 606 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).
WEBSTER, PADOVANO, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Benicia Demedrano v. Labor Finders OF the Treasure Coast & Amisure Ins. Co., 8 So. 3d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…ecessary to enable the judge effectively to discharge the duties of his or her office.” A JCC is required to approve any attorney’s fee paid as a result of a settlement agreement. See § 440.20(11)(c), Fla. Stat. (2004); Eshlibi v. Consol. Box Mfg., 962 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Rodriguez v. Graduate Plastics, Inc., 954 So. 2d 629, 630 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). The attorney’s fee is limited to a percentage of the benefits secured. See § 440.34(1), Fla. Stat. (2003).1 A JCC “shall not approve ... a joint stip…
Authorities Cited
- Smith v. State, 606 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)