MURRAY LEOPOLD, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES, BUREAU OF ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS, RESPONDENT
MURRAY LEOPOLD, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES, BUREAU OF ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS, RESPONDENT
960 So. 2d 819
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2007)
Topics
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ex Post Facto Clause cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We deny the petition for writ of certiorari on the merits. See Lescher v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 946 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), review granted, 949 So. 2d 198 (Fla.2007); Hill v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 891 So. 2d 1202, 1203 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (piting Cantrall v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 828 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)).
We certify the same question that this court-certified in Lescher:
Does the amendment to section 322.271(4), Florida Statutes, which elimi'nated hardship driver’s licenses effective July 1, 2003, violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws as to persons who could have applied for a hardship license before the amendment became effective?
946 So. 2d at 1142.
Certiorari Denied.
STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Cantrall v. Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 828 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- Lescher v. Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 946 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
- Lescher v. Florida Dept. of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, 949 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 2007)
- State v. Daniels, 891 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)
- Hill v. Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 891 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)