WELLINGTON FARMER, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Karayiannakis v. Nikolits, 23 So. 3d 844 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
  …nstitution. Second, it is used in the context of devise and descent in article X, section 4(c). The definition of "homestead” in those two contexts is distinct from that term’s definition in the context of property taxation. See Phillips v. Hirshon, 958 So. 2d 425, 427 n. 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ("It is well appreciated in the case law concerning homestead that the definition of homestead property for Article VII, section 6 purposes is not the same as Article X, section 4 of the Florida Constitution.”); see also…
• Geraci v. Sunstar EMS, 93 So. 3d 384 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)
  …stinguish Wartels. See In re Lisowski, 395 B.R. 771, 777 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2008) (concluding that, under Wartels, the homestead exemption from forced sale applies only to improved land or real property that is owned by the debtor); Phillips v. Hirshon, 958 So. 2d 425, 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (holding that a co-op did not qualify for homestead exemption for purposes of descent and devise because it was not an interest in realty under Wartels). However, we do not find the reasoning of these cases persuasive because…
• Baldwin v. Henriquez, 279 So. 3d 328 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)