PHILLIP ADLINGTON, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
PHILLIP ADLINGTON, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
954 So. 2d 43
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellant’s response to our order of November 8, 2006, we have determined that the Order Striking Motion for Rehearing is not an appeal-able order. Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(4); Lewis v. State, 928 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
BROWNING, C.J., WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LSG Sky Chefs v. Gertrudis Santaella (Fla. 1st DCA 2020)…t of her dealings outside the context of this workers’ compensation claim. But, as a general rule, “[i]t is within the JCC’s discretion to resolve a conflict in the evidence and make credibility determinations.” See Landmark Towers, LLC v. Ibarguen, 954 So. 2d 43, 44–45 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); see also Roose & Griffin Landscape Contractors v. Weiss, 558 So. 2d 102, 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (weight of expert testimony and credibility of witnesses are questions for trier of fact). And, the fact that Claimant was o…
-
Intal Constr. v. Moises Mancera (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)…gh the JCC acknowledged that there were unexplained differences between the reports and found that there was no evidence the reports had been altered, she did not make any attempt to reconcile those differences. See Landmark Towers, LLC v. Ibarguen, 954 So. 2d 43, 44−45 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (holding that a JCC may resolve conflicts in the evidence). Instead, the JCC merely noted that the E/C did not argue “any irregularity” with the DWC-25 and accepted the form’s medical directions. She found that the DWC- 25…
Authorities Cited
- Lewis v. State, 928 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)