DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHNNIE LEE RIFE, ET AL., APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2007-03-23
No. 5D06-2957
MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
950 So. 2d 1288 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2007) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a motor vehicle used in the commission of a felony DUI is subject to forfeiture under the general provision of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, even if a specific DUI forfeiture provision does not apply.


Headnotes

[1] A motor vehicle used in the commission of a felony is subject to forfeiture under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act.

[2] The general provision defining a "contraband article" as property used in the commission of a felony controls over a more specific provision regarding vehicles used in DU…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles sought to forfeit Johnnie Lee Rife's vehicle after his felony DUI arrest. The trial court dismisse…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PALMER, J.

PALMER, J.

The Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (the Department) appeals the trial court’s order dismissing with prejudice its forfeiture action regarding Johnnie Lee Rife’s motor vehicle. Determining that the trial court incorrectly applied the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, we reverse.

Rife was arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) in violation of section 316.193 of the Florida Statutes. Because Rife had twice previously, within ten years, been convicted of DUI, his third violation was deemed a felony pursuant to section 316.193(2)(b)l. of the Florida Statutes.1

The Department initiated forfeiture proceedings to seize Rife’s motor vehicle under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, alleging that Rife had used his motor vehicle in the commission of a felony. After conducting a hearing, the trial court dismissed the petition, concluding that no forfeiture could occur for the offense of DUI unless the offender’s license was suspended, revoked, or cancelled as a result of a prior DUI conviction. The trial court ruled that, pursuant to the rules of statutory construction, the specific forfeiture provision for DUI offenses set forth in section 932.701(2)(a)9. controls over the general forfeiture provision contained in section 932.701(2)(a)5. The court erred in so ruling.

The Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act provides that contraband articles shall be seized and forfeited as follows:

932.703 Forfeiture of contraband article; exceptions. — (l)(a) Any contraband article, vessel, motor vehicle, aircraft, other personal property, or real estate used in violation of any provision of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, ... may be seized and shall be forfeited subject to the provisions of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act.

§ 932.703(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005). Section 932.701(2)(a) of the Florida Statutes defines the term “contraband article” as follows:

932.701. Short title; definitions

(2) As used in the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act:

(a) “Contraband article” means:
* * *

5. Any personal property, including, but not limited to, any vessel, aircraft, item, object, tool, substance, device, weapon, machine, vehicle of any kind, money, securities, books, records, research, negotiable instruments, or currency, which was used or was attempted to be used as an instrumentality in the commission of, or in aiding or abetting in the commission of, any felony, whether or not comprising an element of the felony, or which is acquired by proceeds obtained as a result of a violation of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act.

9. Any motor vehicle used during . the course of committing an offense in violation of s. 322.34(9)(a).

§ 932.701(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005)(emphasis added).

Rife’s commission of a felony DUI fits within the definition of using a contraband article in the commission of a felony. Accordingly, pursuant to section 932.701(2)(a)5., Rife’s motor vehicle is subject to forfeiture. See Daniels v. Florida Dep’t. of Health, 898 So. 2d 61 (Fla.2005)(holding when the statutory language is clear, courts have no occasion to resort to rules of construction; they must read the statute as written, for to do otherwise would constitute an abrogation of legislative power).

While section 932.701(2)(a)9. of the Florida Statutes defines a “contraband article” to include a motor vehicle used while driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs if the person’s driver’s license is suspended, revoked or cancelled as a result of a prior conviction, even if such violation is not a felony, that section does not supersede section 932.701(2)(a)5. of the Florida Statutes which defines “contraband article” to include any vehicle used in the commission of a felony. Here, section 932.701(2)(a)9. does not apply because both parties admit that Rife was not driving while his license was suspended, revoked, cancelled or disqualified. Both parties also agree that a third DUI charge that occurs within ten years after a prior conviction is a third degree felony. If either section is applicable, forfeiture is allowed. Under the alleged facts of this case, section 932.701(2)(a)5. of the Florida Statutes was applicable and, accordingly, the dismissal of the forfeiture action was error. REVERSED and REMANDED.

MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur. . Section 316.193(2)(b)l. of the Florida Statutes provides as follows:

316.193. Driving under the influence; penalties.—

(2)[b] 1. Any person who is convicted of a third violation of this section for an offense that occurs within 10 years after a prior conviction for a violation of this section commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. In addition, the court shall order the mandatory placement for a period of not less than 2 years, at the convicted person’s sole expense, of an ignition interlock device approved by the department in accordance with s. 316.1938 upon all vehicles that are individually or jointly leased or owned and routinely operated by the convicted person, when the convicted person qualifies for a permanent or restricted license. The installation of such device may not occur before July, 2003.

§ 316.193(2)(b)l., Fla. Stat. (2005)(emphasis added).

. Section. 322.34(9)(a) of the Florida Statutes provides:

322.34. Driving while license suspended, revoked, canceled, or disqualified

(9)(a) A motor vehicle that is driven by a person under the influence of alcohol or drugs in violation of s. 316.193 is subject to seizure and forfeiture under ss. 932.701-932.707 and is subject to liens for recovering, towing, or storing vehicles under s. 713.78 if, at the time of the offense, the person’s driver’s license is suspended, revoked, or canceled as a result of a prior conviction for driving under the influence.

§ 322.34(9)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …use all parts of a statute must be read together to achieve consistent whole). Sub-subsection (f) cannot be read in a vacuum; it must be considered in conjunction with the rest of subsection (3). See Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Rife, 950 So. 2d 1288, 1289-90 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (holding trial court erred by applying specific definition where more general definition within the same subsection applied). In sum, the Commission clearly erred by refusing to consider whether the compensation informa…
  • Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Frey, 965 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
    …(a), Fla. Stat. (2006). Section 316.193(2)(b)1. makes a third DUI conviction, occurring within 10 years of a prior conviction, a felony, subjecting the violator’s car to forfeiture under the Act. See Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Rife, 950 So. 2d 1288, 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). Frey did not request an adversarial preliminary hearing as permitted by the Act. Consequently, the Department petitioned the trial court to issue an order finding probable cause to proceed with the forfeiture proceeding p…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw