CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE HECHTER, APPELLEE
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
GEORGE HECHTER, APPELLEE
95 So. 2d 504
Florida Supreme Court (1957)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Reversed under the authority of Pensacola & A. R. Co. v. Anderson, 26 Fla. 425, 8 So. 127; Bucki v. Seitz, 39 Fla. 55, 21 So. 576; and Sec. 54.23, Fla. Stat. 1955 F.S.A.; and the cause remanded with directions to enter judgment on the verdict in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 59.04, Fla. Stat. 1955, F.S.A. It is so ordered.
TERRELL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rosen v. The Millers Mut. Fire Ins. Co. OF Tex., 193 So. 2d 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)…ngly. Mrs. Rosen now appeals. While we might have reached a -different conclusion had we sat as triers of fact, we must, nevertheless, uphold the findings of the chancellor absent a showing that they are clearly erroneous. Cowen v. Cowen, Fla.1957, 95 So. 2d 504. The appel-lee, Millers Mutual, is therefore entitled to "having the facts viewed in the light most favorable to it. It appears that the Rosen policy had been ■obtained through an “independent insurance •agent” who had “referred” the Rosen applicat…
Authorities Cited
- Bucki v. Seitz, 39 Fla. 55 (Fla. 1897)
- Pensacola & Atl. R.R. Co. v. Anderson & Peck, 26 Fla. 425 (Fla. 1890)