A.B., MOTHER OF H.C., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE
A.B., MOTHER OF H.C., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE
949 So. 2d 1186
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2007)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this dependency proceeding, A.B., the mother of H.C., a child, appeals an order of the circuit court terminating supervision by the Department of Children and Families, but retaining jurisdiction over the case. The Department properly confesses error, recognizing that the trial court’s order is inconsistent with our decision in W.R. v. Department of Children & Families, 757 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order to the extent that the trial court retains jurisdiction over A.B. and H.C.
' REVERSED.
PALMER, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Jewett, 106 So. 3d 465 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)…he case, and (3) necessary for the jury to properly resolve the issues, so long as the subject of the proposed instruction is not covered in other instructions given to the jury and the failure to instruct is shown to be prejudicial. Mills v. State, 949 So. 2d 1186, 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Golian v. Wollschlager, 893 So. 2d 666, 667 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Robinson v. Gerard, 611 So. 2d 605, 607 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). Because jury instructions are contextual, some background is necessary for the challenged instr…
-
Brown v. State, 61 So. 3d 1238 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)…le on the motion within 60 days operates as a denial, and any order the trial court enters thereafter is a nullity. See, e.g., Dupree v. State, 20 So. 3d 989 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Calidonio v. State, 951 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Mills v. State, 949 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Although the trial court in this case resentenced Appellant, granting the relief sought, it did not do so until November 18, 2010, well outside the 60-day time period prescribed by Rule 3.800(b). Because the court effectively de…
Authorities Cited
- W.R. and D.G. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 757 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)