DADE COUNTY, ET AL
v.
CITY OF MIAMI

Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. | 1970-12-04
No. 69-20988
Knuck, J.
35 Fla. Supp. 36 Dade County Circuit Court (1970)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Court grants motion to strike defendant's objections to request for admissions because defendant failed to serve required notice of hearing with its objections, as mandated by Rule 1.370, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.


Holding

A party objecting to a request for admissions must serve a notice of hearing with its objections, and failure to do so results in the objections being stricken.


Headnotes

[1] Objections to a request for admissions under Rule 1.370, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, must be accompanied by a notice of hearing, and failure to serve such notice re…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the Florida Supreme Court intended the notice language contained therein to be mandatory, just as is the notice language contained in Rule 1.340(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure”

Court's analysis of Rule 1.370 requirements

Facts & Procedural History

Dade County served a request for admissions on the City of Miami. The City objected to the request but failed to serve a notice of hearing with its ob…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
FRANCIS X. KNUCK, Circuit Judge.

FRANCIS X. KNUCK, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs herein served on defendant their request for admissions, pursuant to Rule 1.370, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Within the time allowed by said rule, defendant objected to the request, but failed to serve a notice of hearing therewith. Plaintiffs then filed their motion to strike the objections for failure of defendant to comply with the rule. It is this motion to strike with which the court is now concerned.

An examination of Rule 1.370, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, leads inexorably to the conclusion that the Florida Supreme Court intended the notice language contained therein to be mandatory, just as is the notice language contained in Rule 1.340(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, pertaining to objections to interrogatories. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. Homer, 29 Fla. Supp. 98 (Circuit Court, Dade County, 1967). Such has the salutary effect of speeding the course of discovery. Accordingly, it is ordered —

(1) The motion to strike the defendant’s objections to the request for admissions is granted and said objections are hereby stricken.

(2) Defendant shall respond to the request in accordance with the said rule within ten days from the date of this order, otherwise said requests shall be deemed as admitted.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw