C.W. LOBSTER CO., LLC, APPELLANT,

v.

ANDY SCHNARE, INDIVIDUALLY, BLUENOSE SEAFOOD INC. D/B/A BLUEWATER SEAFOOD, AND RILBRI L.L.C., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Lukacs v. Luton, 982 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
  …res proof of repeated acts. Because of this requirement, the Second District has recognized that double jeopardy principles preclude a criminal conviction for multiple counts of stalking, even during a lengthy time period. See Eichelberger v. State, 949 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Marinelli v. State, 706 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We believe the Second District’s analysis is relevant in our interpretation of the repeat violence injunction statute, which we discuss in more detail below. Appellant argu…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Nestor Rios v. State, 19 So. 3d 1004 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
  …e jeopardy). Even though trial counsel in the present case did not preserve this issue for appellate review, “[b]ecause a double jeopardy violation constitutes fundamental error, it may be raised for the first time on appeal.” Eichelberger v. State, 949 So. 2d 358, 359 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (citing Marinelli v. State, 706 So. 2d 1374, 1375 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); see also Gisi 848 So. 2d 1278; Singleton v. State, 561 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)) (holding that the double jeopardy violation arising out of Sing…
• Welch v. State, 189 So. 3d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
  …double jeopardy before the trial court; however, because a double jeopardy violation can constitute fundamental error, it may be raised for the first time on appeal. See Rios v. State, 19 So. 3d 1004, 1006 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Eichelberger v. State, 949 So. 2d 358, 359 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). . Mr. Welch properly preserved the errors claimed here. To preserve the issue of whether a trial court improperly denied a challenge [*299] for cause of a prospective juror, the defendant must "object to the jurors, show th…