LA PETITE ACADEMY AND GALLAGHER BASSETT, APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES,
v.
JACQUELINE DUPREY, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
La Petite Academy and Gallagher Bassett appealed a Judge of Compensation Claims order awarding attorney's fees and costs to claimant Jacqueline Duprey. The court reversed the $20,500 attorney's fee award as exceeding the statutory percentage limit on benefits obtained, affirmed the $3,834.28 costs award, and remanded for recalculation of fees consistent with established precedent.
The court reversed the $20,500.00 attorney's fee award because it far exceeded the statutory percentage of benefits actually obtained by the claimant, as required under section 440.34. The court affirmed the $3,834.28 costs award and rejected the cross-appeal's constitutional challenge to the amended statute, which has been previously held constitutional by the court.
[1] In worker's compensation cases, an attorney's fee award must be based on the value of the benefits actually obtained on behalf of the claimant.
[2] An award of attorney's fees that exceeds the statutorily mandated percentage of benefits awarded in a worker's compensation case is reversible error.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“In worker's compensation cases, a fee award must be based on the value of the benefits actually obtained on behalf of the Claimant.”
Establishes the controlling standard for calculating attorney's fees under section 440.34, which the lower court violated.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJacqueline Duprey was a claimant in a workers' compensation case against employer La Petite Academy and servicing agent Gallagher Bassett. The Judge o…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal, the Employer and Servicing Agent (E/SA), La Petite Academy and Gallagher Bassett, challenge an order rendered by the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) which awarded claimant, Jacqueline Duprey, $20,500.00 in attorney’s fees and $3,834.28 in costs. The E/SA argue first that the JCC erred in awarding an attorney’s fee which violates the plain language of section 440.34, Florida Statutes, and second, that the JCC erred in calculating costs owed claimant as the prevailing party. Claimant has also filed a cross-appeal, arguing that the legislature’s 2003 amendments to section 440.34 violate both the Florida and United States Constitutions.
This court has previously considered the application of the legislature’s 2003 amendments to section 440.34, Florida Statutes, in a number of our recent decisions, and held that “[i]n worker’s compensation cases, a fee award must be based on the value of the benefits actually obtained on behalf of the Claimant.” Wood v. Fla. Rock Indus., 929 So. 2d 542, 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), rev. denied, 935 So. 2d 1221 (Fla.2006); see also Lundy v. Four Seasons Ocean Grand Palm Beach, 932 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), rev. denied, 939 So. 2d 93 (Fla.2006); Campbell v. Aramark, 933 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Because the JCC in this case ordered the E/SA to pay an attorney’s fee which far exceeded the statutorily mandated percentage of the benefits awarded, we reverse the portion of the order awarding claimant $20,500.00 in attorney’s fees and remand for further proceedings. We affirm the JCC’s award of $3,834.28 in costs without further comment.
We reject the merits of claimant’s cross-appeal because this court has previously concluded that section 440.34, as amended in 2003, violates neither the Florida nor the United States Constitutions. See Lundy, 932 So. 2d at 509-510; Campbell, 933 So. 2d at 1256.
Therefore, we REVERSE the portion of the JCC’s order below which awards claimant $20,500.00 in attorney’s fees, we AFFIRM the portion of the order which awards claimant $3,834.28 in costs. We REMAND the case for further proceedings consistent with this decision.
WEBSTER, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Lundy v. Four Seasons Ocean Grand Palm Beach & Liberty Ins. Grp., 932 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
- Wood v. Fla. Rock Indus. & Crawford & Co., 929 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
- Prudential Sec., Inc. v. Episcopal Diocese of Cent. Fla., 939 So.2d 93 (Fla. 2006)
- Barney E. Tully, Jr. v. State, 933 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)