DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES/DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT, APPELLANTS,
v.
MARICELA ROMANO, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2007-01-09
No. 1D06-0452
WOLF, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
948 So. 2d 815 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2007)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the employer/carrier’s (E/C) response to this court’s order to show cause dated December 4, 2006, the court has determined that the order on appeal is not a reviewable adverse order. See Crown Pontiac, Inc. v. Bell, 547 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). If, in the future, claimant files another petition for benefits seeking benefits from the E/C, the E/C may assert their affirmative defense of misrepresentation at that time.

DISMISSED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw