UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE, COMPANY, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
WILLIAM V. TEJEIRO, M.D., P.A., ETC., RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court quashed a circuit court order that granted quantum meruit recovery to a medical provider without the provider having pleaded that theory, holding that relief cannot exceed what was properly raised in the pleadings.
A medical provider cannot recover on a quantum meruit theory when it failed to plead or brief that theory in the underlying appeal, and the circuit court exceeded its authority by granting relief not sought.
[1] A party cannot obtain relief on a legal theory not pleaded or briefed in the underlying proceeding, and an appellate court exceeds its authority by granting such relief.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“relief may be granted if it is determined that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law which resulted in a miscarriage of justice”
Court cited Ivey v. Allstate Ins. Co. for the standard governing when certiorari relief is appropriate for departure from essential requirements of law.
United Automobile Insurance Company's insured received medical services from Dr. Tejeiro's practice five months after an accident. Tejeiro sought reco…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Quasi Contract cases and more on FLexlaw
RAMIREZ, J.
United Automobile Insurance Company, Inc. petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari seeking to quash an order of the circuit court acting in its appellate capacity which concluded that respondent William V. Tejeiro, M.D., P.A., a medical provider/assignee, was entitled as a matter of law to recover from United the reasonable value of the services it rendered to United’s insured based on a quantum meruit theory, irrespective of United’s pending affirmative defenses. We grant the petition because the circuit court’s order exceeded the relief sought.
As respondent Tejeiro appropriately concedes, Tejeiro did not plead, or otherwise brief below during the appeal from a dismissal order, that it was entitled to recover payment from United for medical services rendered to United’s insured five (5) months after the accident based upon a quasi-contract or quantum meruit theory. On this basis, the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law. See Ivey v. Allstate Ins. Co., 774 So. 2d 679 (Fla.2000) (relief may be granted if it is determined that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law which resulted in a miscarriage of justice).
We therefore grant the petition, quash the order under review, with directions to remand to the county court to reinstate the Complaint and to conduct further proceedings on the merits in accordance with the issues as raised in the pleadings, and to grant the medical provider’s motion for attorney’s fees conditioned upon its ultimate success on the merits with respect to recovery under the policy.
Certiorari granted; order quashed; and remanded with directions.