RICHARD JONES, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Dany Katz Gilbert and Lawrence Gilbert v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 981 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  …l of the transformer through an injunction. In the second suit, the Gilberts sought to recover damages caused by the noise from the transformer and its subsequent removal. This case is similar to Accardi v. Hillsboro [*614] Shores Improvement Ass’n, 944 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), and Inter-Active Services, Inc. v. Heathrow Master Ass’n, 809 So. 2d 900 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). In Accardi this court found that an action for nuisance and trespass was not barred by a previous action for abatement, injunction, a…
• Mitchell v. The Beach Club OF Hallandale Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 17 So. 3d 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
  …ional limits of the circuit court. It then awarded prevailing party attorney’s fees to the condominium association. Mitchell appeals, and our standard of review of the order of dismissal is de novo. See Accardi v. Hillsboro Shores Improvement Ass’n, 944 So. 2d 1008, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). The trial court’s order of dismissal states that the complaint was dismissed without prejudice to refile within the jurisdictional limits of the court. However, Mitchell did not seek monetary relief. Instead, he sought to…
• Aquarius Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Boris Goldberg and Carolyn Crooks, 312 So. 3d 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)
  …n and dismissed the case, ultimately concluding that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. This appeal follows. The standard of review for an order granting a motion to dismiss is de novo. See Accardi v. Hillsboro Shores Imp. Ass’n, Inc., 944 So. 2d 1008, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). The association argues that the trial court erred in dismissing the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, because section 26.012, Florida Statutes (2017), confers subject matter jurisdiction over equitable matters…