M.U., AND O.U., INDIVIDUALLY, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2006-10-24
No. 5D06-467
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
940 So. 2d 1200 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Guardian Ad Litem Program v. Department of Children and Families, 936 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Eroga v. Eroga, 166 So. 3d 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
    …make findings of fact regarding the necessity, cost,- and availability of life insurance to the former husband to secure payment of child support. We, therefore, reverse and remand as to that issue without further discussion. See Gazaleh v. Reeves, 940 So. 2d 1200, 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Finally, the trial court improperly double-counted the 529 College Savings Plan valued at $2,181.82 by adding it to the husband’s assets as an independent asset when it was already included in another account awarded to th…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw