D.B., FATHER OF D.F., A CHILD, APPELLANT,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• A.J. v. K.A.O., 951 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …isposi-tive constitutional consideration” in applying the least restrictive means test. Nor is the least restrictive means test intended to preserve the parental bonds at the cost of a child’s future. See, e.g., D.B. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 940 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Instead, this test requires that “those measures short of termination should be utilized if such measures can permit the safe reestablishment of the parent-child bond.” S.S. v. D.L., 944 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (quoting L…
• Santos v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)
  …ould be violated, he waited two weeks before doing so; therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Appellant willfully and substantially violated his probation when he failed to file the monthly report. Robinson v. State, 940 So. 2d 516, 517–18 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Here the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding the Appellant’s violation to be willful. And there is no argument that he did not know that he was required to wear the equipment outside his clothing; he just…

Authorities Cited

• K.B. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 834 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
• M.M. Father of N.M. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 931 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)