MARIO QUINTERO, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARIO QUINTERO, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
939 So. 2d 333
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon, carjacking, and two counts of false imprisonment. We affirm on all issues, but remand the case to the trial court to correct the scrivener’s error in the judgment. The jury convicted, and the judge properly sentenced, the defendant on two counts of false imprisonment, but the judgment reflects two counts of false imprisonment with a weapon. Upon remand, the court should correct the judgment to accurately reflect the charges on counts five and six.
Affirmed.
POLEN, KLEIN and MAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fajardo v. State, 193 So. 3d 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)…grants in the jurors.” This contention, however, lacks any foundation in the record. Defense counsel’s questions about the witness’s immigration detention appear aimed only at exposing any bias or motive to be untruthful. See, e.g., Liotta v. State, 939 So. 2d 333, 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (holding that the defense witness’s immigration status was relevant to bias because the defendant was his employer, landlord, and sponsor for an immigration visa). In any case, while a trial court has “a duty to protect [a…
-
Newby v. State, 945 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…eflects that appellant entered a plea to these charges, we remand for correction to reflect that he was tried by jury.. See Baker v. State, 925 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Browning v. State, 932 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Quintero v. State, 939 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Affirmed, but remanded to correct the scrivener’s error in the judgment. STEVENSON, C.J., and STONE, J., concur.…
-
Segura v. State, 972 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)…flicting instruction. Weiand v. State, 732 So. 2d 1044 (Fla.1999). We have previously rejected the argument that the reading of both instructions on the duty to retreat and the absence of a [*1107] duty to retreat is confusing. See Liotta v. State, 939 So. 2d 333, 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Dias v. State, 812 So. 2d 487, 492 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Wilson v. State, 707 So. 2d 1200, 1201 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Accord Barnes v. State, 922 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), quashed on other grounds, 970 So. 2d 332 (Fla.2…