ABRAHAM & ASSOCIATES, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
SURREY HOLDING CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, SILVERI LEASING, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND MIKE SILVERI, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Procuring Cause cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Abraham & Associates, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of its five-count Third Amended Complaint. Abraham, a licensed real estate broker, alleges that it brought together the seller, Surrey Holding Corporation, and the buyers, Silveri Leasing, Inc. and Mike Silveri, who went through with the sale and purchase of Surrey’s property without Abraham’s knowledge. The causes of action asserted by Abraham are (1) procuring cause, (2) breach of an oral listing agreement, (3) breach of a completely performed unilateral offer, (4) unjust enrichment, and (5) tortious interference with a business relationship.
This court reviews an order granting a motion to dismiss de novo. We find that the trial court erred in dismissing the complaint because the allegations made are sufficient to state a cause of action in each count.
Reversed and Remanded for Further Proceedings.
STONE, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kellerman v. THE Bd. of Trs. of the City of Hollywood Firefighters' Pension Sys. (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)…this action. (Emphasis added.) Certain individual counts were also dismissed on other grounds, but are not challenged on appeal. “This court reviews an order granting a motion to dismiss de novo.” Abraham & Assocs., Inc. v. Surrey Holding Corp., 939 So. 2d 332, 332 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). “To rule on a motion to dismiss, a court’s gaze is limited to the four corners of the complaint, including the attachments incorporated in it, and all well pleaded allegations are taken as true.” Swerdlin v. Fla. Mun. Ins.…