WILLIAM MICHAEL SETTLES, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• McKENNA v. Camino Real Vill. Ass'n, Inc., 8 So. 3d 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)
  …vided that the lower tribunal may not render a final order disposing of the cause pending such review. (Emphasis added). In turn, we lack jurisdiction to review the merits of an order entered by a tribunal lacking jurisdiction. See Bemben v. Chock, 938 So. 2d 565, 566 (Fla. 2d DCA2006).3 The procedural quagmire in which this appeal has landed requires some untangling. The August order was non-final, as it simply required the owner to deposit monies into the court’s registry, but did not resolve the issues b…
• Gibson v. Progress Bank OF Fla., 54 So. 3d 1058 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
  …e an appeal of a nonfinal order was pending at the time, the trial court violated the express language of rule 9.130(f) by entering final judgment without having jurisdiction to do so. The summary judgment is thus null and void. See Bemben v. Chock, 938 So. 2d 565, 566 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“The final summary judgment is a nullity because the trial court entered it during the pendency of the Sell [*1061] ers’ interlocutory appeal of an order denying their motion to dissolve the Buyers’ lis pendens. See Fla. R.P…
• Dourest J. Robinson, III v. Chamonix L. Robinson, 998 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
  …ssolution and even enter an order containing findings and determinations from that hearing, but it could not enter a final judgment while the nonfinal appeal was pending unless this court expressly authorized it to do so. See, e.g., Bemben v. Chock, 938 So. 2d 565, 566 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (reversing final summary judgment entered during pendency of interlocutory appeal). The trial court entered the final judgment in September 2007 and Mr. Robinson filed a timely appeal.2 He raises seven issues on appeal as to…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Carter, 835 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 2002)
• Blackshear v. State, 771 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)