SAID AWAD, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SAID AWAD, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
937 So. 2d 1179
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order under review is affirmed pursuant to the emphasized portion of Anderson v. State, 627 So. 2d 1170, 1171 (Fla.1993)(“To support summary denial without a hearing, a trial court must either state its rationale in its decision or attach those specific parts of the record that refute each claim presented in the motion.”)(emphasis added).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dieguez v. Craig E. Weissberg, P.A., 3 So. 3d 441 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…sumption of correctness attaches to the trial court’s decision and this Court’s review is limited to whether errors appear on the face of the judgment. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979); Porteous v. Porteous, 937 So. 2d 1179, 1181 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Prymus v. Prymus, 753 So. 2d 742, 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Here, the client has failed to overcome the presumption of correctness attached to the trial court’s decision, and no errors appear on the face of the trial court’s…
Authorities Cited
- Anderson v. State, 627 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 1993)