IDA JERRY STANLEY A/K/A IDA J. STANLEY, ET AL., APPELLANT,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, ET AL., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court did not err in entering a summary final judgment of foreclosure.
The appellant challenged the foreclosure judgment, arguing the appellee failed to prove ownership of the note and mortgage. The appellee filed the ori…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Assignment Of Note And Mortgage cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Ida J. Stanley appeals the summary final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Wells Fargo Bank. On appeal, Ms. Stanley contends that the pleadings and evidence of record failed to substantiate Wells Fargo’s ownership of the note and mortgage that are the subject of the foreclosure proceedings. We disagree for several reasons.
First, Wells Fargo filed the original note and mortgage with the court, which strongly suggests its ownership. Secondly, its affidavits averred to its ownership of the note and mortgage. Finally, the record contains an assignment of the note and mortgage to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., and printouts from the comptroller’s office, showing various name changes undergone by Norwest so that it is now known as Wells Fargo Bank.
We acknowledge that the information from the comptroller was not in affidavit form. However, the record contains no transcript of the hearing. As a result, we do not know if any objection was made to the court’s consideration of that information. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979). We assume, therefore, that the trial court properly considered it.
Finding no error, we affirm the summary judgment of foreclosure.
AFFIRMED.
PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Citibank, N.A. v. Dalessio, 756 F. Supp. 2d 1361 (M.D. Fla. 2010)
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)