MICHAEL SKIPWITH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL SKIPWITH, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
934 So. 2d 544
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
On Motion foe ClaRification
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s motion for clarification is hereby granted, and we clarify that this court’s per curiam affirmance of this case is without prejudice to appellant’s raising his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.
POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brigham v. Brigham, 11 So. 3d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…es were sued in their individual capacities as well as in their trustee roles. After the appointment of a special master who agreed with the trial court, Dana and Patricia appealed. This Court upheld the trial court’s decision in Brigham v. Brigham, 934 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), concluding that Dana and Patricia had violated section 737.403, Florida Statutes (2003), by paying their attorneys fees from trust assets without receiving prior court approval. Appellants moved for partial summary judgment on n…
-
J.P. Morgan Tr. Co., N.A. v. Siegel, 965 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…Therefore, “[the trustees] should have obtained court approval before exercising their trustee power to use trust funds to pay their attorney’s fees.” Id. This court reversed the denial of the surcharge against the trustees. Id. Brigham v. Brigham, 934 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), is a recent case following Shriner. The parties in Brigham were the beneficiaries of a trust. 934 So. 2d at 545-46. The appellees sued the appellants in their individual capacities as well as in their capacities as trustees alleg…