ANGEL MULGADO, APPELLANT,
v.
DEISY RODRIGUEZ, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2006-07-06
No. 1D06-0813
BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
933 So. 2d 657 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The Commission on Ethics’ motion to dismiss is granted. This appeal is hereby dismissed. Appellant as complainant was not a party to the proceeding below before the Commission on Ethics, and, therefore, is not a proper party to proceed in this appeal. See § 112.3241, Fla. Stat. (2005); Fla. Admin. Code Rule 34-5.011 (providing that the respondent is the only party to an action before the Commission on Ethics),

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Wood v. State of Fla. Comm'n on Ethics, 79 So. 3d 212 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
    …BENTON, C.J. I concur in the result on the authority of Mulgado v. Diaz, 933 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Mulgado v. Rodriguez, 933 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); and Campen v. Jones, 376 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw