GARRY WRAY, APPELLANT,
v.
SARA HARRELL, APPELLEE
GARRY WRAY, APPELLANT,
SARA HARRELL, APPELLEE
927 So. 2d 171
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2006)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Although the trial court in this case had jurisdiction of the parties in the subject matter, it appears from a review of the record that the injunction was entered under section 741.30, Florida Statutes (2005), instead of section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2005). The injunction is nevertheless supported by competent substantial evidence. Accordingly, we AFFIRM, without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek modification from the trial court.
KAHN, C.J., WOLF and BENTON, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fuccio v. Palma Durso, 48 So. 3d 1013 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…e injunction as being a matter within the trial court’s equitable jurisdiction, under section 784.046 of the Florida Statutes (2008), which authorizes injunctions for protection against repeat violence. Durso relies upon the case of Wray v. Harrell, 927 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), to support her argument. In that case, the opinion reads: Although the trial court in this case had jurisdiction of the parties in the subject matter, it appears from a review of the record that the injunction was entered unde…
-
Pietro Fuccio v. Bruno Durso, 48 So. 3d 1011 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…e injunction as being a matter within the trial court’s equitable jurisdiction, under section 784.046 of the Florida Statutes (2008), which authorizes injunctions for protection against repeat violence. Durso relies upon the case of Wray v. Harrell, 927 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), to support his argument. In that case, the opinion reads: Although the trial court in this case had jurisdiction of the parties in the subject matter, it appears from a review of the record that the injunction was entered unde…