JUNIOR BONILLA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JUNIOR BONILLA, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
916 So. 2d 3
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2004)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Gipson v. State, 616 So. 2d 992 (Fla.1993); McCall v. State, 862 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Collins v. State, 800 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); State v. Kinney, 670 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Martin v. State, 795 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
As this corut did in McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 884 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), supplemented on rehearing, 884 So. 2d at 952 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan.14, 2004).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
WHATLEY, SALCINES, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Erick Richardson v. State, 884 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
- McCALL v. State, 862 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Collins v. State, 800 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
- Gipson v. State, 616 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 1993)
- Martin v. State, 795 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
- State v. Kinney, 670 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)