TIMOTHY KELLY, PETITIONER,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2005-08-25
No. 1D05-2473
WOLF, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
911 So. 2d 821 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Brown v. Campion, 757 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

WOLF, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Scott v. State, 147 So. 3d 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)
    …cause Issue One was not adequately preserved. “[U]nder the corpus delicti rule, the State has the burden of proving, by substantial evidence, that a crime was committed before a defendant’s confession can be admitted in evidence.” Martin v. State, 911 So. 2d 821, 822 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); see Burks v. State, 613 So. 2d 441, 443 (Fla.1993). The State offered into evidence undisputed proof that Appellant had a prior felony conviction. As to the element of possession of a firearm, the State introduced statement…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw