FLOYD BOYER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2005-09-21
No. 4D04-3223
POLEN, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
910 So. 2d 426 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s challenge to orders of two trial judges denying his requests for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The first order, entered by Judge Makemson on December 13, 2001, summarily denied all but two of appellant’s grounds alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The second order, entered by Judge Conner on July 12, 2004, denied the remaining grounds F and I following a full evidentiary hearing.

Both orders set forth valid, detailed findings and conclusions supporting denial of relief. The findings made by both judges are amply supported by the record and by competent, substantial evidence. No error is found in the judges’ conclusions denying the motion. The orders are, therefore, affirmed.

POLEN, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Frederic Bouin v. Disabatino, 250 So. 3d 168 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)
    …ad been dissolved. In short, under Florida law an interspousal tort claim may be brought in the dissolution of marriage action, or it may be brought in a separate action not associated with a dissolution of marriage action. San Pedro v. San Pedro, 910 So. 2d 426, 428 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). However, “[w]here no specific transaction or agreement exists between the spouses, the dissolution of marriage statute, specifically, subsection 61.075(1), provides the exclusive remedy where one’s spouse has intentionally…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw