CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND GEORGE S. OKELL, SR., APPELLANTS,

v.

OLAVI M. HENDRICKSON, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• City OF Boca Raton v. Cassady, 167 So. 2d 886 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
  …clearly in conflict with the controlling principle that a municipal officer (not serving at the pleasure of the appointing authority) can be removed only for cause after notice and hearing. Hendrickson v. City of Miami, 10 Fla.Supp. 19, affd. [Fla.] 91 So. 2d 816; Burklin v. Willis, Fla. [App.] 1st 1957, 97 So. 2d 129; State ex rel Gibbs v. Bloodworth, 134 Fla. 369, 184 So. 1; Bryan v. Landis, 106 Fla. 19, 142 So. 650. Once the plaintiffs were appointed to such Board they became entitled to serve out their t…
• Longo v. City OF Hallandale, 42 Fla. Supp. 53 (Broward Cty. Cir. Ct. 1975)
  …rly in conflict with the controlling principle that a municipal officer not serving at the pleasure of the appointing authority can be removed only for cause after notice and hearing. Hendrickson v. City of Miami, 10 Fla. Supp. 19, aff’d, Fla. 1957, 91 So. 2d 816; Burklin v. Willis, supra; State, ex rel. Gibbs v. Bloodworth, 134 Fla. 369, 184 So. 1 (1938); Bryan v. Landis, supra. [*63] In Burklin v. Willis, supra, the court announced a corollary to the rule of Bryan v. Landis, supra, which is particularly ap…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Bloodworth, 134 Fla. 369 (Fla. 1938)