ANUAR GIRALDO, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• McDONNELL v. State, 981 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)
  …police to perform a search. See Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983); Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 88 S.Ct. 1788, 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968); Reynolds v. State, 592 So. 2d 1082, 1086 (Fla.1992); Smith v. State, 904 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). The appellants assert that Christopher’s consent to search the residence was not voluntary because he acquiesced to a show of authority. Appellants assert the factors showing that the consent to search the residence was involunt…
• Blake v. State, 939 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
  …h DCA 1992); State v. Jarrett, 530 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); State v. Wells, 516 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); State v. Reeves, 488 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); State v. Bennett, 481 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Compare Smith v. State, 904 So. 2d 534, 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). We conclude, therefore, that there was competent, substantial evidence to support the findings of the trial court, and we conclude further that there was no error in the application by the trial court of the law to the fac…
• Bordelon v. State, 908 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
  …ng question by the State: “Was Mr. Bordelon detained at least to the extent that he was to wait until you determined his identification?” Nobody had used the word “de [*545] tained” on direct examination or on cross-examination.2 See Smith v. State, 904 So. 2d 534, 536 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (“The word ‘detained’ is a term of art, having a particular legal meaning in the law enforcement context. To ‘detain’ someone is to hold the person in custody; confine them; or subject them to a compulsory delay. See Bl…

Authorities Cited

• Sanford v. State, 872 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
• Arroyo v. State, 901 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)