HERBY LUMA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HERBY LUMA, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
903 So. 2d 302
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Forcelledo v. State, 898 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)(“The State is allowed to give notice under as many classifications as it chooses, where the State is prepared to show the defendant meets the statutory criteria.”); Cooper v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(notice deficiency does not render a sentence “illegal” for the purposes of a rule 3.800 petition; claim should have been raised via 3.850 and is now time barred).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Miller Seabrooks v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
- Cooper v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
- Forcelledo v. State, 898 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)