MICHAEL A. SANDERS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 5th DCA | 2005-04-29
No. 5D04-961
SAWAYA, C.J., PETERSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.
903 So. 2d 241 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Sanders’ petition for writ of habe-as corpus based on the. lack of factual assertions regarding the exhaustion of his available administrative remedies. However, our decision is without prejudice to Sanders to file a proper petition together with appropriate allegations and attachments.

SAWAYA, C.J., PETERSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Swift v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
    …PER CURIAM. Denied. See Sanders v. State, 903 So. 2d 241, 242 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“We affirm the trial court’s denial of [the] petition for writ of habeas corpus based on the lack of factual assertions regarding the exhaustion of his available administrative remedies.”); Pryor v. Singletary, 709 So. 2d 6…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw