RODOLFO G. ORTIZ, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• The Fla. House OF Representatives v. Expedia, Inc., 85 So. 3d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
  …by appealing the final judgment. In the present case, there is no ongoing proceeding between the parties to the lawsuit and the individuals who have been ordered to provide discovery. As to these individuals, the order is final. See Smith v. State, 902 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (holding that an order imposing sanctions against an attorney for one of the parties in a pending case is final and therefore immediately appealable by the attorney). Based on the holding in Calderbank and our own decision in Tran…
• Carlton Fields Jorden Burt v. SP Healthcare Holdings, LLC, 163 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
  …of a group of ambulatory surgery centers from the plaintiffs, SP Healthcare Holdings and ASC Holdings, Inc. (Holdings). This appeal concerns an order imposing monetary sanctions against CFJB stemming from a discovery controversy. See Smith v. State, 902 So. 2d 179, 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (holding that an order imposing monetary sanctions on trial counsel and directing that the sanctions be paid by a date certain was a final, appealable order). We reverse and remand for further proceedings. A short history of…
• Parrish v. RL Regi Fin., LLC, 194 So. 3d 571 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
  …lly, an order imposing monetary sanctions against trial counsel and directing that they be paid on a certain date is a final, appealable order. See Burt v. SP Healthcare Holdings, LLC, 163 So. 3d 1274, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (citing Smith v. State, 902 So. 2d 179, 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)). The sanctions order at issue here established an entitlement to attorney’s fees and costs, but it did not reduce the award to a fixed amount in a final order. An order determining an entitlement to attorney’s fees and costs…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Miller Seabrooks v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)