JAMES S. HARRIS, PETITIONER,
v.
DADE COUNTY CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus because the petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right or exhaustion of administrative remedies.
A pretrial detainee in Miami-Dade County jail sought a writ of mandamus to compel the Department of Corrections to restore his telephone privileges, w…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ministerial Duty cases and more on FLexlaw
ROTHENBERG, Judge.
James Harris, a pretrial detainee in the Miami-Dade County jail, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the County Department of Corrections to restore his telephone privileges. We deny the petition.
The petitioner, James Harris, claims that he is being detained pre-trial in the Dade County Jail; that his telephone privileges have been restricted; and requests that this court issue a writ of mandamus compelling the Department of Corrections to provide him with full access to the telephone. Apparently, the petitioner is currently residing in a group cell where access to the phone for all inmates in his cell has been limited to weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., due to ongoing complaints of telephone fraud.
To obtain “a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must demonstrate a clear legal right to the performance of a ministerial duty by the respondent and that no other adequate remedy exists.” Morse Diesel Int’l v.2000 Island Blvd., Inc., 698 So. 2d 309, 312 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); accord, Borja v. Nations-Bank of Fla., N.A., 698 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
As the petitioner has failed to provide any record proof of his assertion that he has been denied access to his attorney, that he has exhausted the administrative remedies available to him, or that the trial court which has control over his custody has ruled on the matter, we clearly lack jurisdiction to address the issue. We, therefore, deny the petition without prejudice to the petitioner to address the merits of his claim through the appropriate administrative process.
Petition denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Morse Diesel Int'l, Inc. v. 2000 Island Boulevard, Inc., 698 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
- Borja v. Nationsbank OF Fla., N.A., 698 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)